Concerns with Winburn on Transportation, Freight and Clean Energy

City Council Member Charlie Winburn claims that he now supports state funding for an Uptown portion of the Streetcar. While that sounds good, as a Cincinnati Streetcar supporter, I am skeptical.

The reason I am skeptical is that Winburn has opposed this project from the very beginning. He didn’t support state funding when the funds were actually available. In fact he not only voted against the project on Council before it started, but voted to shut down the project after construction already began.

I find it interesting that when he ran city wide, he argued that citizens in the suburbs didn’t support this project. However, now that he is running for state senate in an area that includes Downtown, Uptown and other neighborhoods that largely support Democrats he suddenly has a change of heart.

Taking this position now is also interesting because there are no state funds allocated to the Uptown portion of this project. This is because the Ohio Governor, from Republican Party Winburn belongs to, appointed new members to the board that rejected the funding they had previously requested. The Governor also rejected the stimulus funds to create a 3-C Passenger Rail Line. That would have connected Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus and Cleveland via Amtrak.  

Another reason I am skeptical of his support is because he doesn’t seem to even support our cities connections to freight. His plan to cover our pension debt is to sell the Cincinnati Southern Railway. This is a city owned freight line that has been generating money for the city every year since 1877. In 1987 the City Council endorsed a policy to dedicate funds generated by the Southern Railway to infrastructure projects. The Cincinnati Southern Railroad has proven to be a great moneymaker for the city, bringing in millions every year. Funding city pensions is important, but selling this asset is not the way to do it.

Maybe Winburn hasn't supported these rail initiatives because he doesn't support Cincinnati's sustainability efforts. After all, Winburn supports eliminating the Office of Environment and Sustainability, even though this office has found ways to reduce Cincinnati's energy costs that actually save money. That concerns me if he is to have a voice on regulations for coal, oil and natural gas production in our State. 

The Democrat in the race, Cecil Thomas, supported the streetcar project when he was on council. He did not advocate selling freight lines or eliminating the Office of Environment and Sustainability. These are just a few of the reasons I support his run for the Ohio State Senate for District 9.

Shawn Dunn Turney 1970-2014

Last Friday a fellow coworker passed away. Her service was this morning, and it seemed to be more of a spiritual and transitional celebration than a funeral. There was a lot of call and response from her family and friends.

Her sons spoke about how she taught them to be men, make the right decisions and how they will see her in the next life. I understand the comfort that gives people and hope they are right. She is gone too soon. Hopefully she was able to break on through to the other side so they do get to see her again.

The pastor called this life her dress rehearsal and that her show will go on. She just picked up her transfer ticket to ride and joined the ghost riders in the sky.

GLSEN and the Cincinnati St Patrick's Day Parade

The organizers of this years Cincinnati St Patrick's Parade told members of the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN) they were barred from Marching in this years parade. City Councilman Chris Seelbach said Chris Schulte told them that the parade board voted to reject GLSEN because members didn’t want an Irish Catholic event to include anything related to gays or lesbians.

Five City Council members and several candidates announced they were withdrawing from the popular local event. Councilwoman Laure Quinlivan and council candidate Michelle Dillingham choose to march but protest the exclusion while marching. 

They later claimed that they didn't want the parade to be in any way political. Of course they didn't ban politicians from marching in the parade. Why would they do that when the city funds the parade.

I wrote on Facebook before the parade: I respect those that that chose to march or not march today. I completely disagree with the decision to exclude GLSEN. They should march anyways. What are they going to do? Arrest you for marching in a parade? I agree with the idea of the city giving funds to GLSEN instead of the parade until they reverse the decision. People should be able to march and celebrate a holiday but they city should not financially support prejudice. 

After this statement someone wrote in response: It is essentially a Catholic celebration is it not. Perhaps you don't see the subversive people in the background with their own agenda against the Irish.

As far as I am concerned any argument organizers had to try and discriminate against this group were lost when they accepted $10,000 in taxpayer-funded money from the City. I also stated that the decision to withhold the funds should be limited until they reverse the decision. While I want the parade to continue the city should not fund this event as doing so would be a violation of the 1st Amendent to the U.S. Constitution. The government can not legally support a religious event abridging the freedom of speech or interfering with the rights of citizens to peaceful assemble. 

Someone having a different sexuality or belief than you is not subversive. As socially conservative as the hierarchy of the Catholic church may be I can not imagine that they would support bullying and be against safe schools. This is the agenda that you for some reason seem so afraid of? You are bullying those that are standing up against bullying? Do you think the man who hung out with prostitutes, tax collectors and told us to love one another as I have loved you would stand for this? The Inquisition is over. It is time to leave the 12th and enter the 21st Century. 

Election 2012 Endorsements

I know some progressives are not satisfied by Obama's first term because we didn't win Medicare for all, Cap and Trade or Immigration Reform. There are those that think we should get rid of credit default swaps, derivatives and break up the banks. I ask those folks to look at the circumstances of the last 4 years and the alternatives.

The leader of the Republicans in the Senate Mitch McConnell said his #1 goal was to make Obama a one term president. That is why the Republicans in the Senate fillibustered most of the legislation the Democrats in the House passed. People on the left didn't turn out in 2010 which allowed the Republicans to win back the House and make it more difficult for President Obama to pass the legislation he called for. The Republicans ran on Jobs but blocked the American Jobs Act.

The national debt was a concern before Obama took office and is a concern now but we were entering the worst recession since the great depression. Congress and the Bush administration had already bailed out Fannie, Freddie, AIG, Bear Stearns and all of the major banks.

Economists were telling him that we needed to stabilize the markets and increase consumer confidence. That is why Obama called on Congress to support a stimulus package on 2009 that would help citizens through tax cuts, help the states balance there budgets to avoid job cuts, help invest in green technology, help support the housing sector, the auto industry and invest in infrastructure. While this cost $787 billion some Economists, such as Paul Krugman, believed that the stimulus didn't go far enough and should have been 2 Trillion. Republicans tried to filibuster this but Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Arlen Spector broke ranks to support this. This action helped bring an end to the great recession at the beginning of 2010.

The recession hit us hard and we have had a slow recovery. People often do not realize that we have had 3 years of job growth since then. While unemployment is 7.9% this is down from 10%. The stock market doubled from it's low point and is higher than it was at the beginning of the recession. This is bucking the trend among developed countries. The unemployment rate in Italy and Spain is around 25%. We are expanding while the economies of our trading partners are contracting. That alone is a reason not to change leadership.

Also Romney wants to cut corporate tax rates, capital gains taxes and the tax rates on the rich. This will cost $5 Trillion on top of $2 Trillion in defense spending the pentagon is not calling for. This will be paid for by the middle class by eliminating tax write offs on housing, education and healthcare. This will disproportional hurt the poor through loss of benefits and loss of pell grants to help them earn an education to better their situations.

Romney doesn't support Lily Ledbetter, Contraceptive Rights, the Repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell, Immigration Rights, his advisors support war with Iran and he has changed his positions on virtually everything. He says people can stay on their insurance with pre existing conditions but has no plan to cover them if he repeals the Affordable Healthcare Act. I have a hard time trusting someone that has changed their positions as much as Mitt Romney.

I like Jill Stein and some of what Gary Johnson stands for but I don't want Mitt Romney as our president. Our country can't afford it. That is why I voted for Barack Obama and you should too.

While I am not a fan of bailouts in general the unemployment rate in Ohio would be higher instead of lower than the national average had the auto bailout not taken place. The auto companies paid back the money they were loaned, fuel standards have increased and the industry is thriving again. 

Josh Mandel said we should have let the auto industry go into bankruptcy. Not only that but he is highly funded by out of state Billionaires that are trying to privatize social security, turn Medicare into a voucher program, reduce regulations and continue the subsidizing of dirty non renewable energy. 

Sherrod Brown supported the Dodd-Frank Bill. While I don't think this went far enough to regulate the banks that got us into the economic crisis Josh Mandel wants to get rid of the consumer protections that Congress did pass. 

Also I support the fact that Sherrod Brown did not sign on to more trade deals. While these are good for the profits of multinational companies this often leads to outsourcing and job losses here at home. 

Legislators should not be allowed to create their own districts. This creates a situation where they create districts that are not competitive and this reduces democratic representation. This would create an independent process to draw districts outside of the hands of legislators. Republicans are opposing this because they are currently in power but this will benefit them if the Democrats take back power. The important part is this will give choice to the voters of this state when selecting their representation.

Give council the time to govern the city so they don't spend all of their time campaigning for the next election.

I support Green Party Candidate Rich Stevenson for OH-1 because he supports restoring Glass-Steagall and overturning Citizens United. I do not support Steve Chabot. Democratic Candidate Jeff Sinnard did not set up a website or campaign for this seat. This used to be a competitive district. Gerrymandering added Warren County to the westside of Cincinnati. That is all the more reason to vote Yes on 2.

Additionally I support Issues 42- CPS Levy, Issue 50- Senior Services Levy and 51- Mental Health Services Levy. The state cut funds to these programs. The commissioners cut funds to these levys. None of these levys will raise your taxes. Taxes will actually go down even if they all pass. The services that they provide to the community are all still needed.

Issue Endorsements for the Cincinnati 2011 Elections

2011 is an off year election but it is very important. City Council is up for re election and there as many important issues you can have a voice on by voting. Exercise that right on Tuesday November 8th. These are my Issue endorsements:

Issue 2 - No because 2 keeps Ohio's anti-labor Senate bill 5 in place. SB 5 restricts public workers rights to collective bargaining. This limits the rights of our Teachers, Nurses, Police Officers and Firefighters.

Issue 3 - No because this under minds the core of the Healthcare proposals savings in federal deficit reduction as well as minimizing consumer savings. This law is largely not in place and will not be until 2014. We currently pay for hospital visits for the uninsured as taxpayers already. This could jeopardize our States access to federal Medicaid funds causing more citizens to lose their insurance coverage.This means that we would have to continue the practice of locally subsidizing indigent care through tax levies on a local level. No matter how much the Tea Party drapes this issue in the flag of personal freedom what they don't tell you is undermining the mandate will lead to less people insured, less deficit reduction, higher property tax levies and higher health premiums. That is fiscally irresponsible.

Issue 32 - Yes supports general improvements for the Cincinnati School district.

Issue 37 - Yes supports Health and Hospital Services.

Issue 38 - Yes supports Child Services.

Issue 44 and 45 - Yes on Electric and Gas Aggregation because these are green proposals that  can save you money on your monthly bill.

Issue 46 - No because 46 will loosen local campaign finance laws in a time when we need more transparency and accountability.

Issue 47 - No because 47 is another charter amendment referendum to kill a tax proposal when the city has a $33 Million shortfall.

Issue 48 - No because 48 will amend the city charter to limit public and private rail investment for the next 10 years. We need jobs and investments in public transportation. Rail investments spur population and economic growth in cities across this country. Mark Twain said he wants to be in Cincinnati when the world ends because we are 10 years behind the rest of the world. Lets not leave ourselves 20 years behind.

X-Men vs. Reality Part 2: The Civil Rights Movement

Professor X has come to be compared to civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. and Magneto to Malcolm X. Professor Xavier's dream of a world where humans and mutants peacefully coexist is similar to Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream. King dreams of a nation that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

Malcolm was raised by a Pan-African black preacher. Three of his father Earl Little's brothers, one of whom was lynched, died violently at the hands of white men. His family had to relocate after threats from the Ku Klux Klan. All of this affected his outlook.

Magneto sees mutants not as a dangerous minority to be subjugated but as Homo-Superior, the next stage of evolution, who should rule over the humans that have subjugated mutants. He created a separatist group called the Brotherhood. Magneto's outlook was developed through Anti-Semitic subjugation at the hands of the Nazi's during WWII. Magnus is Jewish and was a prisoner in Auschwitz. His tattoo number is 214782

When the X-Men first started out the characters were rather black and white. There was definitely a good vs. evil theme similar to most superhero stories. As the comic progressed the characters became more gray. Some X-Men stories have Magneto working with the X-Men on common goals.

I believe that Malcolm was a product of his environment that was evolving. He went from a hustler that drank, ate pork and slept with white women to a NOI leader renouncing his previous behaviors. He came to see the NOI as corrupted by Elijah Mohammed as time went by and came to worship with Muslims of all races at the end of his life. Some have postulated that his vision had he lived may have come more inline with that of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

That is possible had they both lived longer. They were both black civil rights leaders that came from black Baptist backgrounds. They both opposed the war in Vietnam and civil rights abuses. I can picture them as leaders in the Occupy Wall Street movement today. Though much like the movement I believe they would still have some differing goals.

X-Men vs. Reality

In the 50s Junior Senator Joseph McCarthy taught Americans to fear the Communists. In the 21st Century Rep. Peter King taught us to fear Muslims.

In the world of the X-Men Senator Robert Kelly taught us to fear the Mutants.

In the 50s the U.S. blacklisted actors as subversives. In the 21st Century the U.S. locked up suspected Muslim terrorists without a trial.

In the world of the X-Men Senator Robert Kelly convinced Americans that they needed to register mutants to protect humans.

In the 20th Century the U.S. collected information on subversives with COINTELPRO. In the 21th Century the U.S. used the Department of Homeland Security.

In X-Men the mutants are rounded up by Sentinels created by Dr. Trask, Liaison Henry Peter Gyrich and authorized by Senator Robert Kelly. The were created by Shaw Industries as part of Government Project Wideawake.

Anti-Muslim Hysteria leads to attacks on Muslims at home. Anti-Mutant Hysteria leads to attacks on Mutants at home.

Those that are kidnapped are monitored in both worlds.

In the 20th Century the U.S. engaged in wars with Communists in Korea and Vietnam.

In the 21th Century the U.S. is engaging in wars with Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan.



In the X-Men world the humans declare war on the mutants.



Is the real world mimicking the world of the X-Men or are the creators of the X-Men mimicking the real world?

Note: While I realize that there are real threats to the U.S. my point is not to equate all of these actions as unprovoked antagonism by the government against Muslims. We were attacked on 9/11. My issue with the war on Terror is that it is too unfocused and open ended. Obviously all Muslims are not terrorists. 19 Hijackers attacked us. 14 were from Saudi Arabia and the rest were from Yemen and UAE. My issue is that we used that as a pretext for war with Afghanistan and Iraq. We used it as a pretext to detain people without trial. We used this a pretext to wiretap citizens and take away our Constitutional rights regardless of warrant or suspicion. The solution to 9/11 should not be endless war. The solution should not be a police state.

Tax cuts for the rich are not as important as the needs of laid off citizens & federal workers

Our priorities are backwards when tax cuts for Millionaires are more important than unemployment benefits for laid off citizens & pay for federal workers. The right is engaging in class warfare. Democrats shouldn't cave on these issues. I don't support Obama's pay freeze. If you are laid off, work for government or make less than 250K you should write you congressmen and women to pay employees & extend unemployment.

Once Reagan started cutting taxes for the rich in the 80s the deficit began to sky rocket. He pushed the theory of trickle down economics but it hasn't worked.

Clinton's budgets stabilized the deficits in the late 90s but the Bush tax cuts for the rich helped bring about rapid deficits again. People need to remember that a large portion of the stimulus under Bush in 2008 and Obama in 2009 was tax cuts too. Taxes are actually at an all time low.

I'm not even saying that I'm against renewing tax cuts for the poor and middle class at least on a temporary basis. They have been shafted over the past 30 years by outsourcing, credit card hikes, payday lenders and sub prime loans. We are coming out of a recession and people need a break.

Why are the Republicans willing to hold up tax cuts for everyone else so they can pass tax cuts for Millionaires? The average unemployment check is $290 a week that helps people skate by paying their bills and spending their money stimulating the economy. The average tax cut for millionaires is hundreds of thousands of dollars for people that don't need the money. Billionaire William Buffett paid 19% in taxes last year which is lower than most of his employees. That is why he is supporting raise taxes on the rich.

Why are we giving tax breaks to multi-national corporations to ship jobs overseas? Is that in the interest in the American people? Those corporations and the millionaires that fund the candidates (anonymously due to Citizens United) perpetuate this cycle of the government doing what is best for the rich (i.e. tax breaks) or the corporations (i.e. bailouts for companies with bad business practices that we're deemed too big to fail) while leaving middle class and working class Americans to fend for themselves.

In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. The top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers). In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%.

In 2003, just 1% of all households -- those with after-tax incomes averaging $701,500 -- received 57.5% of all capital income, up from 40% in the early 1990s. On the other hand, the bottom 80% received only 12.6% of capital income, down by nearly half since 1983, when the bottom 80% received 23.5%.

As of 2007, income inequality in the United States was at an all-time high for the past 95 years, with the top 0.01% -- that's one-hundredth of one percent -- receiving 6% of all U.S. wages, which is double what it was for that tiny slice in 2000; the top 10% received 49.7%, the highest since 1917.

The ratio of CEO pay to factory worker pay rose from 42:1 in 1960 to as high as 531:1 in 2000 at the height of the stock market bubble according to research by United for a Fair Economy. By way of comparison, the same ratio is about 25:1 in Europe.

The United States needs to look at the needs of the average citizen first if they want to avoid allowing our country to become a Third World nation.

Park51 Islamic Community Center Plan for Lower Manhattan

This post is about what is being called the Ground Zero Mosque. However I will not call it the Ground Zero Mosque because it is not at Ground Zero and it is not a Mosque.

This past weekend I was in Lower Manhattan and I went to check out Ground Zero while I was in the area. This is what I saw:



I walked three city blocks away from the Northeast corner of Ground Zero to 51 Park Place to see the abandoned Burlington Coat factory building where the Islamic Community Center is planned to be built. This is what I saw:



The project's organizers state that it is intended to be "a platform for multi-faith dialogue. It will strive to promote inter-community peace, tolerance and understanding locally in New York City, nationally in America, and globally," and have stated that it is modeled on the noted Manhattan Jewish community and cultural center, the 92nd Street Y.

If that doesn't sound scary it's probably because it isn't. The leader of the project Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf is a moderate that worked with the Bush Administration on outreach to the Muslim World.

I know people came to New York City the week before protesting this Community Center. I wonder how many of them know it is being financed by Saudi Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal who is the biggest shareholder of Fox News Corp. aside from Rupert Murdoch.

If you have a sense that most New Yorkers don't want this Center you might want to see what people wrote on the sidewalk in front of the building:



You might wonder what the folks outside of the building thought about it:







You might even be curious what people wrote on the building:





One of my favorite quotes comes from one of our founding fathers Benjamin Franklin. That quote was, "Those that would trade in their freedom for protection deserve neither."

We as citizens of the U.S. can learn a lot from that statement. Our enemies want us to live in terror and fear. They want us divided so they can recruit those who will oppose us because they don't like what we represent.

Our country was founded on the concept of freedom of religion. Many early settlers came to North America to escape religious persecution. That is why our founding fathers included freedom of religion in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. That means that we the people have a right to practice religion in this country regardless of our denomination or affiliation. This includes Catholics and Protestants, Muslims and Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and even protects the rights of non-believers.

New York City is an epicenter of Religious, Ethnic and Cultural Diversity. The World Trade Center was a symbol of the world economy. The attacks on 9/11 were symbolically an attack not just on the U.S. but on a major financial center of Western Civilization.

There are so called Christians that want to blame those attacks on Islam collectively and engage in a Holy War with the 1 Billion Muslims in the world. That world view only plays into exactly what Al-Qaeda wants.

Yet the Bible and the Koran both see the Hebrew Bible as being foundational to their religions. All of the Abrahamic faiths have at their core the concept of loving thy neighbor as thy self.

I saw signs of hope that some New Yorkers support the concept of coexistence. One of the most powerful things I noticed was the windows of the building at the southeast corner of Ground Zero:



In conclusion my experiences reminded me of another famous quote that came from our 32nd President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He stated in his Inaugural Address that "We have nothing to fear but fear itself."

I believe we can learn a lot from that statement because if we spend the rest of our lives living in fear of those that are different from ourselves then the terrorists have already won.

Streetcar Defense and the Museum Center at Union Terminal

Yesterday I read the opinion column of the Cincinnati Enquirer and saw that one of the readers wrote in to complain about the article of the Sheriff supporting the Streetcar. They said that the Sheriff was right to compare the Streetcar to the Cincinnati Metro because ridership for the Metro was down.

I want to say that I don't ride the Metro. Not that I never have but I have a car and just don't use it. I couldn't tell you the routes or times that are subject to change but I can tell you that I will ride the streetcar. This will be a new experience for a lot of people in Cincinnati who were not around when they got rid of the streetcars we did have. I travel between Uptown Clifton and Downtown Cincinnati a lot and would love to have the opportunity to hop on the line with a consistent path and schedule as opposed to driving downtown to try and find a distance spot, find change for a meter or lot and walk the rest of the way to my destination.

This Friday I was at the Museum Center at the Union Terminal downtown, a possible streetcar destination in the future. The Children's, Natural History, Cincinnati History and America I AM museums were free.

While I was in the Cincinnati History Museum I was excited to see the Streetcar that was part of the Clifton/Ludlow line. Climbing aboard was like going back in time but it was a little sad to see that it just now sits in a Museum exhibit outside of use. It's time to resurrect the Clifton Downtown streetcar line once again.

Hamilton County Sheriff Supports the Streetcar

The Cincinnati Enquirer reported yesterday that Hamilton County Sheriff Simon Leis supports the Streetcar. He told the Enquirer about his trip to Portland, Oregon and his positive experience he had on their recently installed Streetcar system. He talked about the low fares and development that has been built along the line since it was installed.

The Cincinnati Streetcar system has been modeled after the system in Portland, Oregon. There was a feasibility study that was conducted in regards to the planned system for Cincinnati. Portland, Oregon spent $57 million to build its streetcar system and recouped $1.6 billion in development. According to research, the investment in Cincinnati could bring in $3 billion in development out of a $128 million investment for the lines from the Banks to Uptown. The study determined that there is a 14:1 cost benefit ratio.

The study was completed in 2007 that focused on creating a 4.5 mile loop from The Banks, through Downtown and Over-the-Rhine. The study suggested several extensions. The extensions include a line through Cincinnati's "Uptown" communities including the University of Cincinnati, the Cincinnati Zoo, and the neighborhood of Clifton. Other possible lines could go out to Union Terminal, a line to the East End using abandoned track and a line connecting Downtown to Newport, Kentucky via the Taylor-Southgate Bridge to Newport on the Levee.

Now that federal, state and local funds have been secured for the project development should begin. These include funds from OKI, Ohio Department of Transportation, Ohio TRAC, city of Cincinnati bonds, local funds and a U.S. Department of Transportation grant. The initial phase is slated for completion by 2013.

Glencoe-Auburn Hotel and Clecoe-Auburn Place Row Houses

In 2009 I went exploring with some friends of mine this abandoned neighborhood between Over the Rhine and Mt. Auburn. The community was nicknamed Little Bethlehem due to its proximity to Christ Hospital. The homes are known as the Clecoe-Auburn Place Row Houses.

This photo shows the Glencoe Auburn Hotel:



I took photos and I researched what the case was with the area.

Apparently there are 54 buildings constructed between 1884 and 1891. The architect is unknown now but the builders were either Truman B. Handy or Jethro Mitchell.

As you can see from the photo below the houses are now vacant and boarded up:



They were designed as single story apartments for the poor as opposed to row houses. The homes were renovated in 1964 but fell into disrepair in the 1990s due to drugs and crime. In 2002 the remaining renters were evicted.In January of 2004 the properties were placed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Also in 2004 Pauline Van der Haer of Dorian Development purchased the property. They planned to convert the buildings into row house condominiums. My friend can be seen pointing at the building that was repainted blue as part of the stalled redevelopment:



Unfortunately this projected stalled out due to disagreements and funding problems between the developer and city council.

Turntables & Snares at Grammers

It is going down Friday, August 20th 2010!

Outdoor Stage

10:00-10:45 - Shotski w/ DJ Pillo

11:15-12:00 - The Best Revenge w/ DJ Dirty C

Red Room Stage

10:00-10:45 - Pete Dressman and the 6 w/ DJ Justin Hatfield

11:15-12:00 - Eclipse w/ DJ Mowgli

12:30-Close - Where They Landed w/ DJ Aaron Glorius

Movie Room Stage

10:00-10:45 - Worthington Law w/ DJ Empirical

11:15-12:00 - Buckra w/ DJ Optik

12:30-Close - The Electric Generals w/ DJ Stump

Bar Stage

10:00-10:45 - Majestic Man w/ DJ Rude Cat

11:15-12:00 - Zella Whelms w/ DJ Harvination

Purpose

I created this blog to share my commentary on music, politics and local events in and around the Greater Cincinnati area. I will also share my thoughts on National and International stories of the day.

I DJ locally around town as DJ Rude Kat. I have a wide variety of music but typically spin Soul, Funk, Ska, Reggae and Early Hip Hop. Occasionally I fill in for John and Hilly's Yeah Night playing recent Indie and Dance Punk. I have had gigs at C&D Northside, Baba Budans, Grammers, Golden Lions and local weddings.

I will include information on upcoming events I will be participating in as well. Feel free to share your comments on this page. I'm a strong supporter of the 1st Amendment and would like to make this blog as open a public forum as possible.